Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added new Use Case Description section to the Supplement Introduction #353

Conversation

ToddCooper
Copy link
Collaborator

@ToddCooper ToddCooper commented Dec 6, 2024

New section added to Supplement Introduction:
Use Cases: Mapping Clinical Scenarios to Profile Requirements

📑 Description

☑ Mandatory Tasks

The following aspects have been respected by the pull request assignee and at least one reviewer:

  • Changelog update (necessity checked and entry added or not added respectively)
    • Pull Request Assignee
    • Reviewer

New section added to Supplement Introduction:
    Use Cases:  Mapping Clinical Scenarios to Profile Requirements
@ToddCooper ToddCooper added this to the SDPi 2.0 Review milestone Dec 6, 2024
@ToddCooper ToddCooper self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
@ToddCooper
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Simple section added to the Supplement Introduction for those reviewers who are familiar with IHE TF profile use case sections and draw a "What is this?!" when they see what we have done in the SDPi supplement.

* SES Non-Comprehensive Note Added

A note was added to section 1:2.2 to indicate that the SES sections in the document are not intended to represent comprehensive risk management requirements and that implementers must ensure that appropriate RM processes have been completed.

* Simple formatting update

Highlighted the primary point of the HL7 ballot comment.
@JavierEspina JavierEspina marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 13:25
ToddCooper and others added 2 commits December 9, 2024 14:26
New section added to Supplement Introduction:
    Use Cases:  Mapping Clinical Scenarios to Profile Requirements
…ion-of-how-use-cases-are-integrated-into-the-specification' into 263-hl7-2024-jan-expand-explanation-of-how-use-cases-are-integrated-into-the-specification
@JavierEspina
Copy link
Collaborator

Requires @d-gregorczyk's approval to unlock merging

@ToddCooper
Copy link
Collaborator Author

SDPi Friday 2024.12.13 --

Need to close this PR and open a new one with the same changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants